Have your say on Essex fire service cuts

Survey – Essex’s deputy chief fire officer Gordon Hunter reviews the questionnaire online Survey – Essex’s deputy chief fire officer Gordon Hunter reviews the questionnaire online

THE people of Essex can have their say on the future of fire stations, firefighters and fire engines in the county as the fire service braces itself for major cuts to its funding.

You can take part in a survey by clicking on the link with this report.

Gordon Hunter, the deputy chief fire officer for Essex County Fire and Rescue Service, admits fire stations could close, jobs could be lost and there could be fewer fire engines on the streets as the most radical overhaul of the service ever takes place.

But he wants to minimise the impact of the cuts and wants the public’s help to make savings.

He said: “This is a major review of everything we do and we want everyone to play their part because we are all in this together.

“We have been working over the past 18 months on services and doing our best to save money.”

The fire service has been saving money by not filling roles, cutting costs and looking at ways to raise money. But if cuts of between 25 per cent and 40 per cent are confirmed this autumn when the coalition Government announces the results of its public spending review, everything will change.

Mr Hunter said: “At the moment it is an unknown area. Even 25 per cent is a massive cut. Imagine your wages cut by 25 per cent – you would have to change your whole style of living.

“It is no different for the fire service. We still have to deliver a service but have to radically look at everything we do, cut back on the things we like to do and add to the products we deliver.

“The worst case scenario is 40 per cent cuts. We would have to look at the fire service across the county – travel times, closing stations and staff cuts. Essex County Fire and Rescue Service will get through this, but we will be different.”

Mr Hunter used the example of the new fire station at Rayleigh Weir helping to save money. He said it was in a better location, which improved services and meant other stations could be closed.

This could be introduced countywide, but the decision will be taken based on a combination of risk, incidents over the past five years and expert knowledge.

He said: “Essex is such a diverse county. The south is very industrial, so higher risk, and north more rural. If we were siting stations today, they would be put in different places and we would probably not have as many. A big station in an area could give as good a response as three small stations."

  • CLICK ON THE LINK TO COMPLETE THE SURVEY

Comments(13)

APR says...
4:24pm Fri 6 Aug 10

How many more threads are we going to get on this subject ?

Boris says...
7:35pm Fri 6 Aug 10

To complete the survey, you have to accept some level of reduction of service, even when you have just ticked that you would find any reduction in service level unacceptable. Not a fair survey.

Anna Key says...
8:40pm Fri 6 Aug 10

Well at least in this country we 'get a say'. We'll be completely ignored, but we'll get a say.
In Essex we can be proud that the FBU is among the most militant in the country, and their inevitable fight to save our services is one we should all support.

Roj says...
9:35pm Fri 6 Aug 10

APR - The more threads the better I would think. Everyone was moaning they knew nothing of the cuts when the changes were made with Rayleigh and Hadleigh. And now we are complaining we are getting too many threads??



Anna Key - I agree with you, unless they start striking. As long as the FBU agree that changes might be nessercary and that not everyone can be pleased. With front-line services already cut right back, and more losses in that area could cost lives!

Anna Key says...
10:25pm Fri 6 Aug 10

It's been said before but the obvious should always be emphasised - especially when it so winds up the free market fundamentalists! All the Tory cuts are part of the Tory class war. The less well off and the vulnerable are the most hit - Age Concern has expressed opposition - and issues of density of population and Rackman landlords are very very real. Anyway, be good to see the inevitable Wolfie Smith and Young Ones Rick insults again. Or this time you could even try and put up an argument!

APR says...
10:46pm Fri 6 Aug 10

".............Roj, Rayleigh says...
9:35pm Fri 6 Aug 10
APR - The more threads the better I would think. Everyone was moaning they knew nothing of the cuts when the changes were made with Rayleigh and Hadleigh. And now we are complaining we are getting too many threads??.........."

.
I wasn't complaining Roj, it's just that I don't quite see why, when we already have a thread that generates a lot of posts.
The Echo starts another thread on exactly the same subject

APR says...
1:34pm Sat 7 Aug 10

One also has to ask, if anyone actually takes any notice of the survey results ?

Or is it just a PR exercise, thought up by someone at Fire Service HQ, to see if anyone loves them ?

Roj says...
5:06pm Sat 7 Aug 10

The survey isn't really important, its just being used to get ideas from the public or lead us to believe that way. Once the results of the findings have finished and the fire service finds out how severe the cuts are going to need to be, it will release its Intergrated Risk Management Programme, its this survey that is important in deciding the cuts if you are able to understand the wording in it as it was that area that caused so many problems before.

k4y1 says...
7:08pm Sat 7 Aug 10

Roj wrote:
The survey isn't really important, its just being used to get ideas from the public or lead us to believe that way. Once the results of the findings have finished and the fire service finds out how severe the cuts are going to need to be, it will release its Intergrated Risk Management Programme, its this survey that is important in deciding the cuts if you are able to understand the wording in it as it was that area that caused so many problems before.
Makes you laugh if the survey isn't that important how about making some cuts there.

Boris says...
10:56pm Sat 7 Aug 10

As has already been stated, surveys like these are just so they can tick the box to say they have consulted. They already know what they are going to do, which is why they guide you into giving the answers they want, but if you don't, they will go ahead anyway. We have seen this so often - especially from Colchester Borough Council - that it fools nobody.
Success to the FBU in their efforts to defend the jobs of their members, whom we all might depend on one day when we least expect it.

Roj says...
1:18am Sun 8 Aug 10

It would be quite interesting to hear the FBU's stance on this as they have been relatively quiet up till now with the only voices we are hearing are from the Fire Service telling us how bad the FBU are behaving with their efforts to protect the firefighters!

k4y1 says...
7:50pm Sun 8 Aug 10

Roj wrote:
It would be quite interesting to hear the FBU's stance on this as they have been relatively quiet up till now with the only voices we are hearing are from the Fire Service telling us how bad the FBU are behaving with their efforts to protect the firefighters!
Fire service cuts, mmm I wonder how the person/people putting this cut forward would feel if someone they cared/loved were in a fire. It bets me when money is put before safety.

old-timer says...
10:15am Mon 9 Aug 10

Don't ask the general public for their opinion;let the firemen decide.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree