Purfleet Primary "improving" say Ofsted

A THURROCK primary school served with a notice to improve last December has been told that it is making satisfactory progress.

Purfleet Primary School had a monitoring inspection in July, after Ofsted found the school to be inadequate in its overall effectiveness last year.

The December 2011 Ofsted report said that the school needed to raise pupils attainment in all subjects, particularly in English and Maths, and that inadequate teaching needed to be eliminated by December 2012.

But the check-up found the school to be improving overall, despite some classes having three different teachers in less than seven months as the school struggled with staffing.

Inspector Susan Vale told the school that the quality of teaching is improving, as is pupils achievement in reading, writing and mathematics, although the standards are still below the national average.

In a letter to head teacher Deborah Henley, Ms Vale said: “Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the school is making satisfactory progress in addressing the issues for improvement and in raising the pupils’ achievement.

“Pupils’ achievement, particularly in reading and writing across the school, is improving.

“Standards in English and mathematics are improving and are closing the gap on previous underachievement.

“Pupils are starting to take a more active part in reviewing their own work, although this varies from year to year. Improvement has been supported through a number of initiatives including a thorough review of the curriculum.

“There has been an increased emphasis on the teaching of basic skills including the teaching of letters and sounds and pupils are consistently encouraged to apply their sounding-out skills to help spell difficult words and improve their reading and writing.

“One-to-one tuition has also supported pupils’ achievement in both English and mathematics.”

She added: “The quality of teaching is improving, despite the considerable number of changes within staffing. Some year groups have experienced three different teachers in the last seven months due to difficulties in recruiting and retention.

“Teachers’ expectations have been raised through both training and the introduction of clearly laid-out expectations for all staff, including work on planning, challenge, differing teaching styles and sharing good practice.

“More rigorous monitoring of lessons by the headteacher and senior leadership team, and involvement from the governing body, are having a positive effect on improvement.”
 

Comments(6)

Thurrockbob says...
7:35am Tue 25 Sep 12

Who gives a 4x what ofstead say ...... useless twallops.

Bernard 87 says...
8:18am Tue 25 Sep 12

It is important that failing schools are given the support to improve. For too long the last government allowed schools to fail even though they were pouring millions into the education system. Until a better system is devised to make sure that schools are heading in the right direction, they will be stuck with Ofsted.

Dave_ says...
9:47am Tue 25 Sep 12

Unfortunately Bernard is right we are stuck with box tickers like OFSTED until we get someone in govt who has the commonsense to ditch all of the moronic box tickng cuture that we have been hampered by for the last couple of decades.
It amazes me that a school manages to turn itself around in 6 months after what must have been a steady decline, it makes you wonder what the previous inspectors were doing? Could they not see the problems? Aren't they supposed to be the experts in seeing them and suggesting solutions etc? This just highlights further their collective incompetence, as surely the sensible thing is for it not to get that bad in the first place.

E.C.M2012 says...
6:56pm Tue 25 Sep 12

Although I agree with 'Bob', the school has improved beyond recognition and deserves credit where credit is due! Bravo Debbie Henley, the Governors and Staff!

Dave_ says...
2:45pm Wed 26 Sep 12

It still begs the question ... how as it come so far in effectively 5 months of teaching time? The "success" of a school as far as I'm concerned is a combination of pupils attitude to learning, teachers desire to teach even the most difficult pupils and to some extent the parental view of education and the premises. As far as is reported none of these factors have changed, so as I say how as it managed to improve in 5 months?
Was the "failing" at the top or bottom of the scale?
How had the OFSTED numpties and LEA come to that, allowed it to get to the point that it was "failing". What has or will be done to prevent it happening again?
If was a headmaster/mistress I'd want to know why they had allowed the school to get to that point and having allowed it, in their 'expert' opinion what do they suggest?
Whenever you see a school has "improved" in a short time period, it just throws up questions as I have outlined.

E.C.M2012 says...
7:11pm Wed 26 Sep 12

Davey baby,

Change doesn't happen over night! You need to establish where you are. Where you want to get to. And how you're going to bridge the gap accordingly! All at the same time as running the day to day life of a school in a deprived area, that isn't attractive to recruiting staff, is in an area that culturally doesn't value education and whilst overturning a negative public perception...not helped by Ofsted Reports!

Debbie Henley has a vision and with the excellent support she has received from outside agencies, including the LA, the outcomes of these combined endeavours are now coming to fruition!

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree