£4million school places boost for Gateway

A TILBURY school has been given a £4million cash boost which will allow it to take in 300 more pupils.

The Gateway Academy, in Marshfoot Road, will use the Government cash to build an extension on top of its new primary school, as well as improving campus infrastructure.

The £6million Gateway Primary Free School is due to be completed in August 2013.

The extension will house a new English and special educational needs block.

The news should go down very well with residents in Tilbury and Chadwell St Mary, who have complained about a shortage of places at the academy.

Headteacher Kevin Sadler said: “It has been very upsetting for us to have to turn away local children, but we are bursting at the seams.

“Now, unless there is a huge house building regime, we should be able to say that any local child who wants to come to the academy will be able to.”

Mr Sadler said the school is grateful to Thurrock MP Jackie Doyle-Price who lobbied hard for the extension for two years.

The Conservative MP said: “The Gateway Academy is an outstanding school, but was never big enough to provide for all local children.

“Times are tough, but we are making a huge amount of money available to give children in Chadwell St Mary and Tilbury a really good start in life.”

Comments(18)

RobF4 says...
8:54am Thu 19 Jul 12

This is good news all round, I hope all those that were involved get the praise they deserve. I do hope that there are no further builds to spoil what is now the right plan for school places; however, we know TBC do not have a good track record on this.

It also shows that it does not matter what party the MP stands for is different to the local party, you do what is right for your constituency. Well done to Jackie, she seems to care a lot about local education and if the response from TBC is not the right one, she will make contact directly with the Government.

Bernard 87 says...
9:04am Thu 19 Jul 12

Completely agree Rob.

freespirit07 says...
11:41am Thu 19 Jul 12

This is all rather confusing. If the Gateway is as Mr Sadler claims "bursting at the seams" how can it accomodate 90 primary children in the exisiting building in September and if it is really so "upsetting to turn away local children" why not admit them instead?. Just expand the school not the empire.

RobF4 says...
12:14pm Thu 19 Jul 12

freespirit07 wrote:
This is all rather confusing. If the Gateway is as Mr Sadler claims "bursting at the seams" how can it accomodate 90 primary children in the exisiting building in September and if it is really so "upsetting to turn away local children" why not admit them instead?. Just expand the school not the empire.
From past press I believe they were to have a free school for a primary, and have had to turn away secondary students in the past as they were full to capacity. I’m unsure how the school site is split from a primary and secondary perspective.

Dave_ says...
2:47pm Thu 19 Jul 12

The irony here is amazing. If the Labour council 10ish years ago hadn't been so up for closing Torells and St Chads and building a school that needed c.1500 places to accommodate the displaced youngsters of Tilbury, Chadwell and Little Thurrock, rather than a school that had inadequacy designed in to it, ie not enough places, then this wouldn't have needed to happen. But they did and hundreds of families in the areas mentioned have been disadvantaged by increased journeys to schools ever since, due to the stupidity of Labour councillors eyeing a quick buck in the sale of Torells (didn't happen) for housing.
As for no further new builds, if the planned build at Thurrock Tech goes ahead, they will need to build another extension in the not too distant future.

freespirit07 says...
4:29pm Thu 19 Jul 12

The school might have had more room for local kids if they hadn't insisted on having a VIth form when it became an academy. That wasn't part of the original plan for Gateway Community College. Why on earth did the closest school to Palmers and the Tech need to be the first to re-introduce a VIth form. Empire building again or do they just like being exclusive? You don't hear much about any results from it.

Dave_ says...
4:08pm Fri 20 Jul 12

Sounds like empire building to me.
The emphasis should have been/be on providing enough places for the local kids aged 11-16. There are plenty of places, like Palmer's to go post 16 and there are likely to be more places at Palmer's as other parts of Thurrock, get there own little 6th Forms.
Although I personally think a school 6th Form is a bad idea as it's too comfortable and you're going to be as open to new thinking etc as you would in an independent 6th Form like Palmer's.

Marcus P says...
5:21pm Sun 22 Jul 12

I don’t wish to denigrate the Gateway Academy. I understand it caters for many children from lower socio economic groups. However the school league tables show that it is ranked only 9th out of the 11 secondary schools in Thurrock. This is in terms of students achieving 5 + 'good’ GCSE grades including English and Maths. Indeed only one student achieved Mr Gove’s much vaunted Ebacc. To be frank if I were the parent of an academic child I would look at a number of other schools before The Gateway. I wonder if the main attraction for the parents in this area are the nice new shiny 47m buildings, rather than the GCSE results.

Well done to the Gateway SLT team for achieving an outstanding Ofsted, despite the school being third bottom in Thurrock.

Marcus P says...
5:24pm Sun 22 Jul 12

Re last post; sorry that should be only 1% acheived an Ebacc.

Bernard 87 says...
8:30am Mon 23 Jul 12

I imagine its bursting at the seams due to the fact it's the only secondary school catering for a very wide catchment area.

Lets hope that with expansion comes better results. Third from bottom is not a good position at all.

Marcus P says...
11:12am Mon 23 Jul 12

Bernard 87 wrote:
I imagine its bursting at the seams due to the fact it's the only secondary school catering for a very wide catchment area. Lets hope that with expansion comes better results. Third from bottom is not a good position at all.
There are other schools not too far away, that can be reached no more than 5 -10 minutes by car or bus. However lets hope the 47m they have received for new buildings results in some significant improvement in terms of the percentage of students achieving 5+ 'good' GCSE' and Gove’s Ebacc. Mrs Doyle Price would agree that judged by her own Governments' benchmark for success the Gateway needs to improve.

I am sure the Gateway is well run and offers a valid curriculum for its current student base. There is no doubt GCSE results have improved albeit from a very low starting base. I do find it odd that it receives such high investment and political support when its GCSE results are amongst the worse in Thurrock.

In fact despite receiving 47m in investment, the Gateway GCSE results are only marginally better than the much maligned Grays Arts and Media School.

Dave_ says...
4:42pm Mon 23 Jul 12

There was a lot of money chucked at the project by Labour and I can't see them allowing to go. But the biggest problem is, it was never big enough to replace Torells and St Chads in terms of numbers and never will be, as a result people are forced to other schools, further away.
It was always on a slippery slope with respect to results.

To be honest where it's located is not ideal, ie on a marsh. If they haven't yet, I can see this having huge and costly structural problems.

freespirit07 says...
5:45pm Mon 23 Jul 12

I heard it was sinking into the marsh but not sure if that is true. What I do know is that the kids there work for three years on their GCSEs (and of course vocational "equivalents") rather than two in other schools. This means they have extra time as well as extra money thrown at them and still get the third worse results. They may also have given up subjects like languages, history and geography completely at age 13 to be hothoused for this "success".The more you go into this the more amazing it is they are getting the political support now.

A Dermot says...
8:45pm Mon 23 Jul 12

freespirit07 wrote:
I heard it was sinking into the marsh but not sure if that is true. What I do know is that the kids there work for three years on their GCSEs (and of course vocational "equivalents") rather than two in other schools. This means they have extra time as well as extra money thrown at them and still get the third worse results. They may also have given up subjects like languages, history and geography completely at age 13 to be hothoused for this "success".The more you go into this the more amazing it is they are getting the political support now.
It was sinking as the site is a natural flood plain, they had to strengthen the foundations during building. A stupid place to build a school.

Marcus P says...
5:51am Tue 24 Jul 12

freespirit07 wrote:
I heard it was sinking into the marsh but not sure if that is true. What I do know is that the kids there work for three years on their GCSEs (and of course vocational "equivalents") rather than two in other schools. This means they have extra time as well as extra money thrown at them and still get the third worse results. They may also have given up subjects like languages, history and geography completely at age 13 to be hothoused for this "success".The more you go into this the more amazing it is they are getting the political support now.
The key word is "political". Both Labour and the Tories are obsessed with the de regulation of state education via academies and now free schools. The Gateway like numerous other academies has received greater funding for political rather than educational purposes. In simple terms academies like the Gateway are costly ideologically driven vanity projects that must not fail.

‘Academisation’ is touted as a means of raising standards. However the evidence in terms of National GCSE results is inconclusive.

I believe it would be more cost effective to have allocated the 47m Gateway money to other schools in Thurrock.

freespirit07 says...
6:40am Tue 24 Jul 12

I think it would have been more cost effective to close the school and send the kids to Eton.

Bernard 87 says...
2:19pm Tue 24 Jul 12

To be honest looking at the tables, Thurrock seems to lack a large number of high acheiving secondary schools. Marcus may be right, 47m might have been better spent dishing it out between those other low scoring schools, expanding a few others and increasing grades rather than building a new school on a marsh which has extremely low results.

Outside of Chafford school and Grays Convent, I wasn't impressed by the pass rate of the rest of the bunch.

freespirit07 says...
5:48pm Tue 24 Jul 12

Marcus P wrote:
I don’t wish to denigrate the Gateway Academy. I understand it caters for many children from lower socio economic groups. However the school league tables show that it is ranked only 9th out of the 11 secondary schools in Thurrock. This is in terms of students achieving 5 + 'good’ GCSE grades including English and Maths. Indeed only one student achieved Mr Gove’s much vaunted Ebacc. To be frank if I were the parent of an academic child I would look at a number of other schools before The Gateway. I wonder if the main attraction for the parents in this area are the nice new shiny 47m buildings, rather than the GCSE results.

Well done to the Gateway SLT team for achieving an outstanding Ofsted, despite the school being third bottom in Thurrock.
Of course if they were in Hackney, Tower Hamlets or Newham they wouldn't be third from bottom with those results.

They'd be right at the bottom.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree