Parliamentary enquiry call over Coryton fiasco

THE closure of Coryton could cost the national economy more than £1billion MP Stephen Metcalfe has told the House of Commons.

During a debate, the Conservative MP for East Thurrock asked the Government to carry out a parliamentary enquiry into the sale of the refinery, which is to become a terminal, after administrators struck a deal with Shell earlier this week.

He expressed concern at the way administrators went about negotiating a deal, given how important the refinery is to the economy, both locally and nationally.

An economic impact assessment, carried out on behalf of Thurrock Council has estimated that the refinery’s closure, which will effect thousands of people and cost hundreds of jobs in South Essex, will see the national economy shrink 0.07 per cent.

Mr Metcalfe told fellow MPs that since the announcement on Tuesday, he has been contacted by various parties who are unimpressed at how the deal with Shell was reached.

He said: “I have received contact from numerous parties expressing deep concern about the way in which the administration has been conducted. They talk of great secrecy surrounding the sale, they say that alternative outcomes could have been explored but were not, and that barriers were put up.”

He told the House, too, that he believed a bid by Igor Yusufov, the former Russian Energy Minister, fronted by Fund Energy, who would have kept the refinery, was the highest.

“My current understanding is that the Russian-led team bid the highest amount, and that the bid was proceeding well until something happened. I have no idea what that something was.

“Whatever happened, however, I am told that that information was not communicated properly by the administrators to the buyers.”

In response, Charles Hendry, the Energy Minister said he would support a parliamentary inquiry, but that results would come too late to save the refinery.

He added that administrators had approached the Government on May 15 to support a bid financially.

He repeated previous statements, claiming that state-aid for the refinery was not possible due to over-capacity in the UK refinery industry but assured MPs that Fund Enery were kept in the loop.

He said: “I have been reassured today by the administrators and by representatives of Fund Energy that they have met on a continual basis throughout this process. They said that they continued to do so right up until the final decision was made.

“Administrators made a formal request on 15 May for the provision of Government assistance for one option of a number that they were considering. Such negotiations are inevitably controversial, but only one option on the table at the time required such assistance.”

Comments(6)

Betrayed1 says...
1:14pm Mon 2 Jul 12

For the sake of those who may have needlessly lost their jobs, for their families and for the council tax payers of Thurrock, we need an urgent and full public inquiry to learn all the details...ALL THE DETAILS!

Thurrockbob says...
4:24am Tue 3 Jul 12

Betrayed1 wrote:
For the sake of those who may have needlessly lost their jobs, for their families and for the council tax payers of Thurrock, we need an urgent and full public inquiry to learn all the details...ALL THE DETAILS!
Fat Chance!

Badger50 says...
7:07am Tue 3 Jul 12

Labour haven't got a clue. They have no idea how to run the country so every time the Socialist Worker gets its knickers in a twist they call for a public inquiry, that will cost the tax payer millions.
New terminal = cheaper fuel for everyone.

Badger50 says...
7:09am Tue 3 Jul 12

PS I know the MP quoted is a Tory, its the violent protesters from the Socialist Worker that annoy me.

Kitrhod says...
6:28pm Tue 3 Jul 12

Badger50 is talking utter rot. A new terminal will NOT mean cheaper fuel. It just means 850 less people employed and the total economy suffering as a result.

hasus12 says...
11:51am Wed 25 Jul 12

I am surprised with the complacency of our energy & environment minister, in the old days when Russian buyers visited our defence factories we were laying red carpets as they were the best payers and that was in the cold war era.

From my research ENERGY FUND is privately held investment group created a world leading businessman with huge experience in Oil and Energy. When no one believed on the viability of direct gas pipeline from Russia to German, Mr Yusufov bet his career on it, Chancellor Schroder is its Chairman and germany enjoys uninterrupted gas supplies and security at the inception of this mega project everyone familiar with the matter both in Russia & Germany were criticizing it as financially unsustainable. The same investor has saved 100s of the ailing German Naval construction.

Why are we in the UK no laying the red carpet yet for an investor who has the financial might, not only to save thousands of job and to create thousands more the refurbishment of our bankrupt Coryton Refinery?

Why cant our minister thing positively and creatively and grab the opportunity of a strategic alliance when the other side is generously giving us a hand in an environment where every job lost overwhelms the tax payers empty purse and energy diversification is key if our minister has any privileged information obliging to oppose Coryton substituency from their lifeline he should at least explain himself publicly in our democratic country rather than stalling his feet.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree