A DEFIANT Tony Blair declared last night, amid growing dissention
about changing Labour's constitution on nationalisation: ''I am doing
this not because it is easy but because it is the right thing to do.''
At stake is the 70-year-old commitment to public control of industry
and the markets.
The Labour leader used a keynote speech to captains of European
industry in Brussels to demand party support for his reform of the
notorious Clause Four, which defined socialism for the fledgling Labour
Party in 1918.
Mr Blair wants to persuade the nation that Labour no longer believes
in nationalisation as an economic solution.
He turned on his critics in the Labour Party, who are seeking to
thwart him at a special conference on ditching Clause 4, on April 30. At
the Commons last night, 50,000 letters were despatched to constituency
parties and others urging resistance.
''The Labour Party is not a preservation society,'' he said. ''Those
who seriously believe that we cannot improve on the words written for
the world of 1918 when we are now in 1995 are not learning from history
but merely living in it.''
Mr Blair, anxious to reassure British industry, stated there would be
''no ambiguity about our convictions and our determination to carry
through our radical programme in government''. He promised: ''The new
constitution will state what we actually believe.
''We believe that there are key services that should remain in public
ownership. Equally, it is not and has not been for decades, the policy
of this party to argue for the wholesale nationalisation of industry. We
need, as well as strong public services, a dynamic modern market
economy. The one assists the development of the other.''
Mr Blair was irritated by the action of some of his Euro-MPs taking an
advertisement in The Guardian yesterday opposing his Clause 4 reforms,
on the eve of his carefully prepared speech in Brussels defining
Labour's attitude to Europe, including the support of monetary union.
Three of the 32 Labour MEPs yesterday dissociated themselves from the
action of MP Alex Falconer (Mid Scotland and Fife), who the Tories
claimed yesterday was using Shadow Chancellor Gordon Brown's
constituency office, which he shares, in Inverkeithing to promote
dissent.
However, left-winger Diane Abbott, a member of the Labour's ruling
National Executive said: ''The party did not pick this fight with Tony
Blair, he picked this fight with the party. He can win at this
conference but what is clear is that he will not win the support of the
majority of constituency parties.''
Tory and Liberal Democrat opponents were rejoicing at Mr Blair's
discomforture. Mr Jeremy Hanley, Tory chairman, issued a factfile called
Reforming Clause 4 -- the politics of presentation -- to try to show
that Mr Blair is not changing anything.
Liberal democrat Treasury spokesman Malcolm Bruce hit harder. ''Even
if Blair wins the Clause 4 vote, people will know that, in power, the
Labour leadership would need to rely for its survival on the 50% of its
members whose beliefs are totally at odds with those of Mr Blair.''
As Mr Blair arrived in Brussels last night, he received a resounding
endorsement of his stand on Clause 4 from the former Labour leader Mr
Neil Kinnock.
Mr Kinnock accused Clause 4 supporters of living in the past. Clause 4
was merely symbolic, he claimed.
He said: ''I don't think a democratic socialist party should get its
defining principles from an icon.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article