THE Indian Ocean tsunami caused damage across thousands of miles. It has affected many millions of lives. The true death toll might never be known.
By last night it had risen to more than 125,000, grimly inflated yesterday by the discovery of some 28,000 bodies in remoter areas of Sumatra, closest to last weekend's undersea earthquake.
Even as the task of identifying the dead (in many cases a hopeless one) and burying them continued, a more daunting challenge confronted the emergency agencies. It is estimated that some five million people throughout the affected areas are at great risk because they lack clean water, food or sanitation.
Delivering relief supplies to the devastated areas where many of them wait for help is a logistical nightmare for international organisations and aid agencies. Jan Egeland, the UN's relief co-ordinator, said it would take another two or three days for the relief effort to be fully operational, by which time it might be too late for many. He conceded that little was being done at the moment. His prediction that frustration would grow was borne out in Banda Aceh, the worst affected area, yesterday. "Cars come by and throw food. The fastest get the food, the strong one wins. The elderly and the injured get nothing.
We feel like dogs, " said Usman, a 43-year-old resident of the city.
For the people who have been left with nothing by the disaster, having to fight for sustenance to survive in a cruel game played by strict Darwinian rules is an insult too far. They need to know that aid is reaching them as effectively and efficiently as possible.
So, too, do the many who have donated to the disaster appeal (Britons have given more than [pounds]25m while the government has pledged up to [pounds]50m).
The UN Office for the Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs (Ocha), the body led by Mr Egeland, is responsible for bringing the global relief effort together so that each pound, or dollar, raised is used to greatest effect. It was set up in 1998 to do just that. It has an annual budget of some [pounds]44m, 11per cent of which comes from the UN's budget and the remainder in donations from member states and organisations. If the UN is a family ready to rebuild people's lives, as Kofi Annan, the secretary general, said yesterday, then Ocha should be its head.
Yet it was described two weeks ago by Hilary Benn, the international development secretary, as an organisation ripe for reform, where staff were poorly trained, there was internal strife and there were no clear means to hold donors to account.
Such criticism might, perhaps, be music to the ears of George W Bush, who rarely misses an opportunity to undermine the UN. Certainly, there are those, including Clare Short, Mr Benn's predecessor, who believe that Washington's decision to hand-pick four countries to co-ordinate the aid effort (the US, Japan, India and Australia) is another example of the world's one superpower sidelining the globe's supranational authority.
Despite the apparent difficulties, the UN must have the central role in the relief effort.
The huge complexity of the task dictates that this should be so. In Ocha's case, it has the opportunity to prove it can manage the millions pledged and the thousands of humanitarian workers in the field upon whose efforts the lives of millions now depend. Demonstrating its credentials in the coming weeks and months will be crucial to putting systems in place for the long term to deal with future disasters. For Britain and America, giving the UN its proper place would show that their motives on the international stage are not just unilateral, but can be multilateral and, crucially, charitable.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article