NOT everything in black and white makes sense - or so the current Guinness marketing campaign would have us believe.
And there were plenty of believers at yesterday's unveiling of DIAGEO, the new brand to consummate the #24bn marriage of Guinness and Grand Metropolitan creating one of the world's largest drinks companies.
Consultants Wolff Olins have been paid nearly #250,000 to put together the Latin word for day and the Greek for the world to capture ''what this company is all about''.
However, most scholars believe the Latin for day is dies but then image making does not necessarily need to be that accurate.
A resigned sounding public relations man at Guinness was anxious to point out that Diageo would not appear on any bottles and would be used only by the parent company for corporate purposes.
Much the same expression of relief was expressed when Diageo was released to an unsuspecting Stock Exchange where it was greeted with a moment of stunned silence. Then came the inevitable questions as to whether it was something one caught on holiday, or was it the cure, or could it be the name of an Argentinian football player.
This was followed by the compulsory promotional video which showed young people engaged in various activities with great vigour, although quite what was not always clear. However as they went about their daily lives they managed to sink 10 million shots of Johnnie Walker or 14 million measures of Smirnoff vodka while scoffing 14 million biscuits and finding room for four million Burger Kings.
Depressingly no-one over the age of 25 seems to live in the world of Diageo - the accent is on the A, apparently.
Other companies have successfully reinvented themselves such as Esso becoming Exxon and Woolworth turning into Kingfisher.
The deal is planned to go ahead in January: shareholders will get a chance to vote on the change of name at the same time as they vote on the merger.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article