AMY'S favourite dress must surely be ruined by now. Regardless of the remarkable cleansing properties of Vanish liquid, regular breakfast-time television viewers would expect that the little poppet's frock could by now be but a shadow of its original colourful glory.
Having endured hundreds of machine washes, you might expect its texture to be somewhere on the Tumbletwist side of boucle. The bright floral print ought to have faded to an Impressionistic melange of blotchy pastels. And that dazzlingly white broderie anglais trim? Gone grimly grey.
Yet, the real miracle is that although Amy is such a messy child (wilfully re-staining her favourite dress on a daily basis) magical powers of restoration have it looking absolutely brand new - even after 100 washes.
Mummy and Granny, however, are not faring quite so well. Time-served Vanishees - cult followers of the trend-setting Vanish liquid commercials - have been astonished to see android substitutions made for the two original, homely figures.
The original mother and grandmother seemed models of respectible sobriety. Sadly their substitutes have probably been drinking that Vanish liquid off-set. For their lips have lost all sense of synch. And Mummy's eyes bulge alarmingly right out of their sockets at that
dramatic moment when she is scripted to scream: ''Oh no, not chlorine bleach!''
All of this proves what a job it is keeping a bunch of kids looking clean and tidy, when most kids display such natural aptitude for getting in a right old mess. Thank goodness that mainstream childrenswear manufacturers understand that their ranges must be machine washable.
Even summer holiday gear - like the jeans, T-shirts and swimwear featured here - must be decently durable. Pint-sized casual clothes should be as serviceable as they are colourful. Or else it won't be Amy's favourite dress that is ruined. It will be her Mum.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article