East Thurrock MP "disappointed" after river crossing debate

South Basildon and East Thurrock MP Stephen Metcalfe

South Basildon and East Thurrock MP Stephen Metcalfe

First published in News
Last updated
Thurrock Gazette: Matt Abbott by , Chief Reporter

THE MP for South Basildon and East Thurrock said he is "disappointed" by the government's response to a debate on a new river crossing.

Yesterday, the transport minister announced he would not look again at options for the new River Thames crossing to land in Canvey Island or Southend, despite pleas from MPs Stephen Metcalfe and Jackie Doyle-Price.

Instead, Robert Goodwill said his department would look at concerns raised over options A and C.

Option A would see a new crossing built next to the current Dartford crossing, while option C would see a bridge or tunnel land between Tilbury Fort and Coalhouse Fort in East Tilbury before joining the A13.

Mr Metcalfe said: "I am disappointed by the minister's response and maintain my staunch opposition to option C and its variant.

"The consequences of this proposal to my constituents are extremely serious and it would not be the right decision for South Basildon and East Thurrock, for South Essex, or for the country as a whole.

"I am therefore writing to the Minister to make a more comprehensive case for widening of the scope of the proposals to re-include options D and E.

"I believe the Government needs to look at potential crossings taking into account the wider opportunities for growth in the Thames corridor, not just the impact it would have on the current crossing. If that were to happen I am sure the outcome would be different."

Labour's Mike Le-Surf, who will challenge Mr Metcalfe for the East Thurrock seat in 2015, accused the Conservatives of being "ineffectual" and "irrelevant" on the crossing and on the area's transport needs.

He said: "This is a disaster for Thurrock residents and its clear that the current Tory MP has no influence in Westminster with his Tory colleagues.

"The local Tories have proved themselves to be both ineffectual and irrelevant regarding the proposed crossing and the transport needs for the area.

"We need free flowing tolls to properly assess the requirement for any type of additional crossing so why is the government pushing ahead before this is in place?"

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

6:01pm Wed 15 Jan 14

skinthegoat says...

YOU'RE "Disappointed" are you?
Well I'm effin Furious......LibLabC
on.....a pox upon all of them....
YOU'RE "Disappointed" are you? Well I'm effin Furious......LibLabC on.....a pox upon all of them.... skinthegoat
  • Score: 1

11:14pm Wed 15 Jan 14

The Hog says...

maybe they should stop the tolls for a two week period. to see free flowing traffic using the tunnel and the bridge.. Then do the same with the bridge closed (simulate bad weather).
I live in Ockendon which turns into a car park when the bridge closes. This must show that the way forward is a tunnel.
they have just built a new port,which can handle super size container ships. Non of the road or rail network has been improved. Was our government (both party's) playing a wait and see game.
maybe they should stop the tolls for a two week period. to see free flowing traffic using the tunnel and the bridge.. Then do the same with the bridge closed (simulate bad weather). I live in Ockendon which turns into a car park when the bridge closes. This must show that the way forward is a tunnel. they have just built a new port,which can handle super size container ships. Non of the road or rail network has been improved. Was our government (both party's) playing a wait and see game. The Hog
  • Score: 1

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree