Squibb bid set for new decision

A COUNCILLOR has slammed a report recommending the approval of a controversial demolition yard.

Squibb Group, which has been operating without the proper planning permission in Wharf Road, Stanford-le-Hope, has made a retrospective application to continue using its site as a demolition contractor’s yard and waste and recycling facility.

People living in the road have long been at loggerheads with the company, who they accuse of making noisy lorry movements, damaging the road, and speeding – all of which the company denies.

Recommendations in a planning officers’ report, which was due to be heard by Thurrock Council’s planning committee on Thursday night, include allowing HGVs to use Wharf Road from 6am in the morning, instead of 7am, and increasing the amount of lorry movements permitted to and from the site.

Conservative ward councillor Shane Hebb, and chairman of Stanford Forum, Terry Piccolo, have collected a petition signed by nearly 500 residents against the application.

In a joint statement, they branded the council’s report “disappointing” and added: “The 6am start is not in the public interest, especially when other sites all have planning consent from only 7am.

“Moving vehicles is a significant noise which resonates over long distances – people must be allowed to have their windows open in the summer months. It’s a basic human right.”

In July 2011, the committee voted to take enforcement action against Squibb after officers investigated the site, which is in the Stanhope Industrial Estate.

But the enforcement notice was quashed due to a technicality with its conditions.

Comments(5)

coddy says...
7:58am Thu 17 Jan 13

Another dodgy decision by Thurrock council planning officers.

I-say-you-say says...
1:41pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Residents of Wharf Road will not give up! And under some of the terms that the Council are going to ridiculously approve, the use of Corringham Road is also to be included. Reports of Squibbs lorries damaging bollards down there, driving on the wrong side of the road and speeding have already appeared and we have those residents joining us in this fight!

Stanfords roads are not capable of accomodating the size and number of vehicles proposed. This, along with other lies by Squibbs, have been proven already. But Thurrock Council will not listen or be reasonable about this situation!

How Squibbs can deny the claims (except for speeding down Wharf Road as this has been adhered to thanks to equipment installed in the lorries) is beyond my comprehension with the amount of proof that has already been shown - proof of the lorries getting stuck because the road is not wide enough, lorries knocking over bollards, lorries mounting kerbs, lorries driving on the wrong side of the road - all caught on camera!

Just goes to show that Squibbs will lie through their teeth despite the proof shown in front of them to get what they want. They will destroy our homes and our lives and then just leave us to rot. Just like they have elsewhere!

I-say-you-say says...
9:38am Fri 18 Jan 13

All I have to say is..... WE WIN! WE WIN! WE WIN! :-D

Well done Thurrock Council on finally listening to reason, taking the actual facts into consideration and not being bullied!

A Dermot says...
7:28pm Sun 20 Jan 13

I-say-you-say wrote:
All I have to say is..... WE WIN! WE WIN! WE WIN! :-D

Well done Thurrock Council on finally listening to reason, taking the actual facts into consideration and not being bullied!
So you buy a house with a road that goes to an industrial estate then you moan because traffic uses that road!

One wonders how the council can enforce against these lorries when the last time the council tried to enforce a lorry ban the Planning Inspectorate overturned it.

I-say-you-say says...
11:29am Mon 21 Jan 13

A Dermot wrote:
I-say-you-say wrote: All I have to say is..... WE WIN! WE WIN! WE WIN! :-D Well done Thurrock Council on finally listening to reason, taking the actual facts into consideration and not being bullied!
So you buy a house with a road that goes to an industrial estate then you moan because traffic uses that road! One wonders how the council can enforce against these lorries when the last time the council tried to enforce a lorry ban the Planning Inspectorate overturned it.
NO!

The houses were there long before the industrial estate. Plus the traffic prior to this company moving down there was light industrial not heavy industrial. They also adhere to the 7am start, as well as numerous other planning rules that this company do not.

The last time had an administrative error, this will not happen again.

I would advise that you get the full story before you begin on the innocent people here - yes, the residents!

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree